Jump to content
  • Adelaide United vs Western Sydney Wanderers 10/04/2021 6:40PM


    mack
    Adelaide United vs Western Sydney Wanderers
    a_league_logo_2017.png

     

    adelaide_united_logo.png VS western_sydney_logo_star.png

     

    Date: 10/04/21
    Sydney Kick-Off Time: 7:10PM EST
    Round: 16
    Competition: A-League Regular Season
    Location: Adelaide, South Australia
    Stadium: Hindmarsh Stadium

    View full record

     


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    LetsPele

    Posted

    Duke up front is completely wasted. He's strength is his capacity to chase, harass, achieve turnovers, break away by running with or onto the ball. His involvement as a striker nullifies all of that and we desperately need that in our midfield where we've been dominated. Troisi and Baccus are unable to dominate or control the midfield. 

    LetsPele

    Posted

    Good defensive clearance from zeigler... 🙄

    MathyouWSW

    Posted

    and of course Ziegler does a sh*t attempt at goal so we'll lose possession.

    MathyouWSW

    Posted (edited)

    They are down to 10
    Vaart is going off his nut, give him a yellow.
    If the squad doesn't take advantage and win this...they aren't a top 4 squad.

    Edited by MathyouWSW
    WHACKO

    Posted

    Back in the game maybe.

    EmMac

    Posted

    Yep that was about right

    mack

    Posted

    Red for D'arrigio. Clear second yellow for taking out Duke on a counter. Really dumb foul to give was always going to get a card.

    ZachMercer

    Posted

    So who's got the keys to the bus for the second half.

    matty

    Posted

    Red card gives us a chance

    WHACKO

    Posted

    If we can't score against 10 we as well give up. Will Robbo change anything I wonder.

    Unlimited

    Posted

    Kamau with a one-on-one... and misses completely

    ZachMercer

    Posted

    Just now, matty said:

    Red card gives us a chance

    Well technically we started with 10....... Zeigler.

    EmMac

    Posted

    If we don't win with them down to 10 men, fold the farrking club

    sonar

    Posted

    Just now, WHACKO said:

    If we can't score against 10 we as well give up. Will Robbo change anything I wonder.

    I would......**** off Zeigler and get tass out there......O'Doherty in stead of Troisi.as well.

    Potkorok

    Posted

    Yay now it’s back to 10 vs 10! Get Ziegler to mark their missing 11th player and all will be sweet...

    Potkorok

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, ZachMercer said:

    Well technically we started with 10....... Zeigler.

    Beat me to it.

    Upthehill

    Posted

    5 minutes ago, mack said:

    Red for D'arrigio. Clear second yellow for taking out Duke on a counter. Really dumb foul to give was always going to get a card.

    Yea Veart arguing that was ridiculous. That was absolutely a second bus ticket

    matty

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, WHACKO said:

    If we can't score against 10 we as well give up. Will Robbo change anything I wonder.

    It's 50/50 now, I wouldn't get your hopes up.

    EmMac

    Posted

    1 minute ago, sonar said:

    I would......**** off Zeigler and get tass out there......O'Doherty in stead of Troisi.as well.

    Yep agreed

    WHACKO

    Posted

    1 minute ago, sonar said:

    I would......**** off Zeigler and get tass out there......O'Doherty in stead of Troisi.as well.

    Agree with Zeigler,  surprised he started.  Get Tass on.  O Doherty for Baccus. 

    WSWJACK

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, sonar said:

    I would......**** off Zeigler and get tass out there......O'Doherty in stead of Troisi.as well.

    Can’t argue with that, stop making sense

    WHACKO

    Posted

    Let me guess no changes for us at halftime as usual. 

    Davo

    Posted

    Adelaide set up with a press to exploit Ziegler’s inability to play football. The red changes things but this is where Carl earns his money. What we were doing wasn’t working at all and we’re losing so the onus is on him to change things. Playing a back 5 against what will be a lone striker in Juric should be the first thing to go.

    Also Vaert needs to settle down. The first yellow was completely reckless and nowhere near the ball, easy yellow. The second was a trip to stop a counter, a yellow every time. Also his argument that it was the wrong player because Elsey ran into a Duke who was already falling from the original foul is a bit desperate.

    WSWJACK

    Posted

    Love Brucie but I still think impact sub is his best position, just wish he was coming on now, weirdly 🥴

    ZachMercer

    Posted

    1 minute ago, WSWJACK said:

    Love Brucie but I still think impact sub is his best position, just wish he was coming on now, weirdly 🥴

    Don't know his mindset mate. He might be a reset type player? 

    Unlimited

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Davo said:

    Adelaide set up with a press to exploit Ziegler’s inability to play football. The red changes things but this is where Carl earns his money. What we were doing wasn’t working at all and we’re losing so the onus is on him to change things. Playing a back 5 against what will be a lone striker in Juric should be the first thing to go.

    Also Vaert needs to settle down. The first yellow was completely reckless and nowhere near the ball, easy yellow. The second was a trip to stop a counter, a yellow every time. Also his argument that it was the wrong player because Elsey ran into a Duke who was already falling from the original foul is a bit desperate.

    To be fair, from his line of sight, he would've seen the "foul" that was Elsey running into Duke and didn't see the small clip that caused Duke to lose balance initially

    matty

    Posted

    Kamaus been one of our better players. Moves into space without the ball (something sadly not too common for us, works hard, and isn't afraid to take the ball direct - and does it well.

    We don't need him as a super sub, we need to start more players like him.

    WHACKO

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, WHACKO said:

    Let me guess no changes for us at halftime as usual. 

    Surprise,  it's all working. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now



  • Posts

    • The Offside changes should be an improvement but the interpretation of interfering with play is terribly wrong. VAR makes it worse.  If they need to draw lines then it isn't clear and obvious. I'd also prefer offside being based on the players feet instead of shoulder, head or whatever.  I tend to think the changes generally are aimed at making it easier for the referees (so they cop less criticism). But the changes to the rules and related guidelines mean the opposite is true.  The Handball situation is enough to discourage anyone to be a referee.  How the hell can a Handball by a defender be decided as the opposite to a Handball by an attacker? The rule makers should firstly revert to the old rules and then consider possible changes with the knowledge of the stuff ups they've made.  Etc, etc, etc!!!!!!!
    • We have more rules changes in the last 6 years than happened for 30 years. Some new rules are better like the kick-off and the drop ball. Handball is a still a nightmare for the referees  The current IFAB board is interventionist. It appears that the powers in charge want the ball in the net no matter if it is legal or not, at least for televised games. Illegally scored goals can be chaulked off by the Video Assistant Referee.  I think the main IFAB intervention guy is an Englishman 
    • Mariners getting obliterated by Yokohama.
×
×
  • Create New...