Paul01 Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 2 hours ago, scarcev said: Look we were piss weak on Friday night and ESFC got rolled by Roar who are in last which is always good to see but riddle me this, why the **** are two teams, one who played in Perth and the other who played in Wellington playing games after only two days' rest when there are no games on a perfectly good Sunday and one game tomorrow night? I mean CCM don't play until next week and Roar not for more than a week so why the hell are we playing these games on no rest? Seriously if this happened in your own grassroots comp you would ring up the comp sec and have the thing changed, this is supposed to be the top tier of football in this country, and they continually make absolutely clueless baffling decisions. The scheduling was diabolical. Our game could have been scheduled on Sunday afternoon during school holidays. They could have had the Western Fraudsters vs Newcastle as the sole Friday night game Edinburgh and nmh94 2
Neverbloom Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Was really weird seeing Bottas at the Adelaide vs victory match, fantastic march though
Sithslayer1991 Posted January 19 Posted January 19 7 hours ago, Neverbloom said: Was really weird seeing Bottas at the Adelaide vs victory match, fantastic march though A surprise, but a welcome one. He chose the right game to attend as well it was a fantastic game. Neverbloom 1
MartinTyler Posted January 19 Posted January 19 17 hours ago, scarcev said: Look we were piss weak on Friday night and ESFC got rolled by Roar who are in last which is always good to see but riddle me this, why the **** are two teams, one who played in Perth and the other who played in Wellington playing games after only two days' rest when there are no games on a perfectly good Sunday and one game tomorrow night? I mean CCM don't play until next week and Roar not for more than a week so why the hell are we playing these games on no rest? Seriously if this happened in your own grassroots comp you would ring up the comp sec and have the thing changed, this is supposed to be the top tier of football in this country, and they continually make absolutely clueless baffling decisions. Peak A League unfortunately
Edinburgh Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Meanwhile, the Bulls have been playing all over Phoenix but are losing 1-2
Neverbloom Posted January 20 Posted January 20 10 hours ago, Sithslayer1991 said: A surprise, but a welcome one. He chose the right game to attend as well it was a fantastic game. Agreed, I am sure people know but I meant match not march 😂 nice to see him not be paraded around like he would be if he was at an AFL match Also go draw for Wellington vs the bulls
mack Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Macarthur forget how to shoot on target, Nix keeper plays like peak Yashin and Nix come back from 1-0 down to win 2-1 with Kosta getting his 100th A-League goal. BoyFromTheWest and MartinTyler 2
Paul01 Posted January 20 Author Posted January 20 3 hours ago, mack said: Macarthur forget how to shoot on target, Nix keeper plays like peak Yashin and Nix come back from 1-0 down to win 2-1 with Kosta getting his 100th A-League goal. And the Bullsh1tters forgot to give Kersey his brown envelope with a little something in it? BoyFromTheWest 1
Davo Posted January 20 Posted January 20 Bulls had 30 shots, which is the highest so far this season, but scored 1 with an xG on target of 2.25. Meanwhile Nix scored twice from 9 shots with an xG on target of 2.15. The pen inflates the Nix numbers a fair bit and the keeper kept them in it.
MartinTyler Posted January 21 Posted January 21 2 hours ago, Davo said: Bulls had 30 shots, which is the highest so far this season, but scored 1 with an xG on target of 2.25. Meanwhile Nix scored twice from 9 shots with an xG on target of 2.15. The pen inflates the Nix numbers a fair bit and the keeper kept them in it. Talking of xG, I'm still in the dark as to how the presentation of xG values is supposed to enhance my enjoyment of the TV broadcast. Can anyone please put me out of my misery?
Davo Posted January 21 Posted January 21 54 minutes ago, MartinTyler said: Talking of xG, I'm still in the dark as to how the presentation of xG values is supposed to enhance my enjoyment of the TV broadcast. Can anyone please put me out of my misery? They're getting better at only showing it when it's of note, rather than every game with the commentator feeling obliged to mention it. It's similar to stats like possession in the last 5 minutes or last 10 shots. If possession was 50-50 and each team had taken 5 of the last 10 shots they aren't going to show it. But if one team had 80% possession in the last 5 mins or took all of the last 10 shots then the stat is noteworthy and they can bring it up to highlight the momentum. If one team is miles ahead in xG then it's a way to quantify the domination. Or if the losing team is ahead in xG that's noteworthy. If it's 0-0 and the xG is 0.2 each then don't bother.
GunnerWanderer Posted January 21 Posted January 21 I got free tickets and went last night; it was a great game. Let me say some of the football Macarthur played was brilliant, Germain the ***** is such a good players and Drew surely can't be far off a socceroos callup, he's very direct and great running with the ball. Macarthur if they can play like that each week, are a threat for the title. nmh94 and StringerBellend 2
Sithslayer1991 Posted January 21 Posted January 21 7 minutes ago, GunnerWanderer said: I got free tickets and went last night; it was a great game. Let me say some of the football Macarthur played was brilliant, Germain the ***** is such a good players and Drew surely can't be far off a socceroos callup, he's very direct and great running with the ball. Macarthur if they can play like that each week, are a threat for the title. They are inconsistent. They will win against Jets and then lose to Nix a week apart.
MartinTyler Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, Davo said: They're getting better at only showing it when it's of note, rather than every game with the commentator feeling obliged to mention it. It's similar to stats like possession in the last 5 minutes or last 10 shots. If possession was 50-50 and each team had taken 5 of the last 10 shots they aren't going to show it. But if one team had 80% possession in the last 5 mins or took all of the last 10 shots then the stat is noteworthy and they can bring it up to highlight the momentum. If one team is miles ahead in xG then it's a way to quantify the domination. Or if the losing team is ahead in xG that's noteworthy. If it's 0-0 and the xG is 0.2 each then don't bother. But how does that enhance my enjoyment? Surely I can make my own decisions about who's on top.
GunnerWanderer Posted January 21 Posted January 21 22 minutes ago, Sithslayer1991 said: They are inconsistent. They will win against Jets and then lose to Nix a week apart. Yep concur but that peak yday particularly in the first half was as dominant as I've seen a team this season. StringerBellend 1
Davo Posted January 21 Posted January 21 33 minutes ago, MartinTyler said: But how does that enhance my enjoyment? Surely I can make my own decisions about who's on top. That's the great thing about a number briefly flashed up on the screen. You still can make your own decision about who's on top.
MartinTyler Posted January 21 Posted January 21 20 minutes ago, Davo said: That's the great thing about a number briefly flashed up on the screen. You still can make your own decision about who's on top. I do see that number but my immediate thought is usually "not that fooking xG shyte again", then it's usually backed up by the commentator who can't think of anything more original to say. Edinburgh and StringerBellend 2
Davo Posted January 21 Posted January 21 13 minutes ago, MartinTyler said: I do see that number but my immediate thought is usually "not that fooking xG shyte again", then it's usually backed up by the commentator who can't think of anything more original to say. Do you feel the same way about the stats they show at half and full time?
MartinTyler Posted January 21 Posted January 21 1 hour ago, Davo said: Do you feel the same way about the stats they show at half and full time? I'm happy to consume actual facts such as goals, goal attempts, corners, saves, cards and even percentage of possession. Anything else if usually frivolous
Edinburgh Posted January 21 Posted January 21 5 hours ago, MartinTyler said: Talking of xG, I'm still in the dark as to how the presentation of xG values is supposed to enhance my enjoyment of the TV broadcast. Can anyone please put me out of my misery? NO! MartinTyler 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now